<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Object oriented programming VS Procedural programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/</link>
	<description>programming, web development, linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bojan Devic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Bojan Devic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 11:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>You can use one of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindview.net/Books/DownloadSites/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;free Bruce Eckel&#039;s Thinking in books&lt;/a&gt;. He has written books about Java and C++.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use one of <a href="http://www.mindview.net/Books/DownloadSites/" rel="nofollow">free Bruce Eckel&#39;s Thinking in books</a>. He has written books about Java and C++.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St Banach</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>St Banach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 21:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>You are right Bojan . OOP is the newest paradigm.   ST Banach 
Ok Bojan. Thanks a lot for the information provided here. I am completing a Masters Degree Program in Information management and I would also like to be certified in Java or C++. What course material for  beginers do you advice for a self -study methodology? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Bojan . OOP is the newest paradigm.   ST Banach<br />
Ok Bojan. Thanks a lot for the information provided here. I am completing a Masters Degree Program in Information management and I would also like to be certified in Java or C++. What course material for  beginers do you advice for a self -study methodology?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bojan Devic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Bojan Devic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>Thanks nuniek </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks nuniek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuniek nur sahaya</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>nuniek nur sahaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>thank for that information. that&#039;s so useful for me and for people. but after i read this article i prefer to use OOP (Object Oriented Programming), like C++ and Java. because more than easy for me. nice information and of course nice article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank for that information. that&#39;s so useful for me and for people. but after i read this article i prefer to use OOP (Object Oriented Programming), like C++ and Java. because more than easy for me. nice information and of course nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bojan Devic</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Bojan Devic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t said it&#039;s new I said it&#039;s newest, there is no newer paradigm than OOP right now. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#039;t said it&#039;s new I said it&#039;s newest, there is no newer paradigm than OOP right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas</title>
		<link>http://www.skepo.info/programming/object-oriented-programming-vs-procedural-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepo.info/?p=87#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Object-Oriented is a new paradigm? 
 
Smalltalk already was object oriented in the 70s and since then it has been further developed.  C++ exists since 1983! How can you call this new? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Object-Oriented is a new paradigm? </p>
<p>Smalltalk already was object oriented in the 70s and since then it has been further developed.  C++ exists since 1983! How can you call this new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
